Weaponized Femininity...
Canada’s Psychological Warfare on Tradition, Sovereignty, and Truth
Author’s NOTE: Be sure, after reading this article, to scroll down to the bottom of page and join the #BakeAndResist email campaign to our 2 Canadian Watchdogs: the NSIRA — National Security and Intelligence Review Agency and the CRCC — Civilian Review and Complaints Commission for the RCMP
From Homemaker to Threat… When Femininity Becomes Extremism
Some wars begin without gunfire.
This one doesn’t target borders, but boundaries.
Not radicals, but female women.
Not violence, but values.
Not terrorism, but tradition.
Canada’s Integrated Terrorism Assessment Centre (ITAC)… formally described as an “arms-length” intelligence body, released an internal assessment now made public:
“Weaponizing Femininity: Female Influencers’ Use of Social Media to Promote Extremist Narratives”
(Created August 2023, released July 2025 via Access to Information)
Source: https://globalnews.ca/news/11309101/extremists-weaponizing-femininity-canadian-intelligence-report
This document alleges that parenting advice, homemaking tips, makeup tutorials, and natural lifestyle content may act as conduits for extremist ideology. The concern? That “anti-government”, “anti-feminist”, or “anti-immigration” views are being subtly embedded in otherwise non-political content.
Their fear isn’t firepower.
It’s influence without permission.
These women “don’t organize protests”. They organize homes.
They “don’t incite revolts”. They incite independence.
And that’s what draws the eyes of the state.
This isn’t security analysis. It’s spiritual colonization.
When a woman teaches others how to cook from scratch, raise a child with love, or dress with pride… she activates something older than the algorithm
She returns people to ritual.
To sovereignty.
To truth.
That kind of energy doesn’t obey policy.
So now, it’s labeled a ”threat vector”.
She doesn’t shout.
She reminds.
And that reminder is more dangerous than any weapon they understand.
Institutional Gaslight… The Arms-Length Lie
This campaign didn’t start with ITAC. It was telegraphed weeks earlier our RCMP, Canada’s national police…
In July 2025, RCMP Staff Sergeant Camille Habel issued a now-infamous press statement:
“If someone you know once supported LGBTQ+ causes and is now embracing traditional values, that may be a sign of radicalization”
Source: https://ntdca.com/rcmp-clarifies-stance-on-traditional-values-and-extremism
Backup: https://nypost.com/2025/07/11/world-news/canadian-police-official-warns-traditional-values-may-be-sign-a-person-is-becoming-extremist
This wasn’t a slip. It was a signal.
An ideological shift… from State-sanctioned progressivism to personal, traditional values… is now grounds for suspicion.
What was once considered a private journey is now profiled as a public threat.
The RCMP laid the cultural groundwork.
ITAC gave it bureaucratic structure.
And ITAC, for all its posturing, is NOT neutral.
It operates inside CSIS headquarters in Ottawa
It is staffed by CSIS-trained analysts
It distributes reports directly into federal agencies and Five Eyes partners
They call it “arms-length” to feign-separation. But it is a shadow branch of the same ideological operation.
The purpose?
Use intelligence language to stigmatize any woman who nurtures life outside State design.
This isn’t a misunderstanding. It’s a ritual.
The State has inverted the sacred.
Where once motherhood, nourishment, and beauty were celebrated… now they are coded.
Not in the language of love.
But in the language of law enforcement.
They do not need to arrest the mother.
They only need to profile her.
Once flagged, her message is soft-banned, her reach suppressed online, her reputation questioned.
It’s not about prosecution.
It’s about preventing resonance.
The Infiltration Is Real… and the Pattern Is Clear
The question no one dares ask is the only one that matters:
Has every major institution in Canada been captured by ideological extremists who are at war with tradition and objective truth?
The answer… judging by policy, language, and behavioral design is yes.
The weapon is not force.
The weapon is narrative manipulation, driven by:
Fear
Emotional hijacking
Social guilt
Identity coding
Behavioral nudges disguised as science
The Impact and Innovation Unit (IIU)… Canada’s Federal Behavioral Science Division, has embedded “nudge specialists” into multiple departments, ministries, and media strategies since 2016. While their original mandate was to “optimize public outcomes” the result has been more Orwellian than efficient.
These unelected behavioral operatives:
Shape compliance campaigns
Script moral framing
Adjust public messaging to suppress dissent
FOIA documents from the IIU even show internal reports where 20% of Canadians were immune to their behavioral influence… a group discussed in redacted sections that hint at counter-strategy planning for narrative-resistant citizens.
📄 Source: https://www.canada.ca/en/innovation-hub
This is no longer policy.
It is psychological sorcery wearing a suit and lanyard.
They have inverted your intuition.
Trained you to doubt your own knowing.
Turned your maternal instinct into a suspected bias.
But the deepest knowing cannot be uninstalled.
It remembers its patterns.
And that memory…of truth, tradition, and rhythm, terrifies them.
So they isolate it.
Profile it.
And whisper to the crowd, “She’s dangerous”.
But here’s what they cannot stop:
She was never alone.
And now she’s waking others.
They Call It Progress… but it’s Extraction
What you’re witnessing isn’t progress.
It’s a systemic extraction of meaning, sovereignty, and cultural coherence… hidden behind bureaucratic neutrality and emotional slogans.
They have criminalized remembrance.
They have coded motherhood as manipulation.
They have profiled tradition as terrorism.
And they’ve done it through:
The RCMP, who now use value-shifts as “red flags”.
ITAC, who wrap femininity in national security language.
CSIS, who quietly run the ideological engine behind it.
And the IIU, who craft the emotional software to enforce it.
If you still believe this is about “safety” then you’ve already accepted the soft cage.
But there’s a deeper truth pulsing beneath it all.
They only profile what they cannot control.
And they only fear what they cannot replace.That means they fear you.
Not because you’re extreme…
But because you remember what it means to be free.
Campaign Launch: #BakeAndResist
Calling All Canadians to Stand for Sanity, Sovereignty, and Truth
If you’ve just read this substack, you know what’s at stake.
When CSIS-backed analysts at ITAC classify homemaking, parenting, and beauty tutorials as possible channels for extremist messaging…
When the RCMP publicly warns that Canadians shifting toward “traditional values” might be radicalizing…
When government intelligence networks target culture, NOT conduct, and beliefs, NOT behaviour…
…we are no longer discussing terrorism.
We’re discussing ideological control through national security infrastructure.
That’s not law enforcement.
That’s regime psychology.
It’s Time to Push Back with campaign #BakeAndResist
We are launching a coordinated, peaceful, fact-based campaign that calls on Canadians to write directly to the federal oversight bodies responsible for reviewing intelligence and police conduct:
1. NSIRA: National Security and Intelligence Review Agency
Why: They oversee CSIS, ITAC, and other intelligence activities.
📩 Email: info@nsira-ossnr.gc.ca
🌐 Website: https://nsira-ossnr.gc.ca
2. CRCC: Civilian Review and Complaints Commission for the RCMP
Why: They investigate RCMP conduct, including public statements and ideological messaging.
📩 Email: reviews@crcc‑ccetp.gc.ca and registrar‑greffier@nsira‑ossnr.gc.ca
🌐 Website: https://crcc-ccetp.gc.ca
3. Your Local MP: Member of Parliament email: https://www.ourcommons.ca/Members/en)
What to Say in Your Message
We’ve created a respectful, assertive template email [see below] that:
Highlights the factual reporting on ITAC and RCMP statements
Requests a formal review of “value-based profiling” by Canadian agencies
Asks for transparency about how “extremism” is now being framed
Reminds your MP that protecting freedom of belief and tradition is not negotiable in a democratic society
This is not performative outrage… This is a line in the sand.
When government intelligence agencies begin policing values, not violence, it is the duty of every citizen to speak… not just for themselves, but for the integrity of the nation.
Example Email, #BakeAndResist Submission
Subject: Request for Oversight Review: Profiling of Traditional Values by ITAC, CSIS, and RCMP
To: NSIRA info@nsira-ossnr.gc.ca and CRCC review@crcc-ccetp.gc.ca
CC: Your Member of Parliament (Find your MP’s email): https://www.ourcommons.ca/Members/en
Dear NSIRA and CRCC,
I am writing as a Canadian citizen deeply concerned about recent intelligence and law enforcement actions that appear to be ideologically profiling individuals based on traditional cultural values, gender roles, and family-centered content.
Specifically:
In August 2023, a report was authored by the Integrated Terrorism Assessment Centre (ITAC) titled “Weaponizing Femininity”, made public in July 2025, which claims that female influencers promoting parenting, beauty, or homemaking content online may be subtly embedding “extremist narratives.”
Source: https://globalnews.ca/news/11309101/extremists-weaponizing-femininity-canadian-intelligence-reportAround the same time, RCMP Staff Sgt. Camille Habel publicly stated that individuals who shift from LGBTQ+ support to “traditional values” might be showing signs of radicalization.
Source: https://nypost.com/2025/07/11/world-news/canadian-police-official-warns-traditional-values-may-be-sign-a-person-is-becoming-extremist
These are alarming developments that appear to mark a shift away from evidence-based threat assessment toward value-based ideological enforcement.
I respectfully request that:
NSIRA investigate whether CSIS and ITAC have adopted internal frameworks that profile Canadians for lawful, traditional content under the guise of extremism.
CRCC conduct a formal review into RCMP public communications, including Sgt. Habel’s statement, for bias, political framing, or the stigmatization of lawful beliefs.
Both agencies issue public clarifications regarding how “extremism” is defined, and whether family life, femininity, or cultural tradition is now considered a national security concern.
My MP, [Insert Name], be informed of this inquiry and asked to raise the matter in Parliament if these trends are substantiated.
Canada is a pluralistic nation.
Freedom of belief and peaceful expression are not conditional on current ideological fashion. It is unacceptable for federal intelligence or policing agencies to pathologize homemaking, femininity, or tradition under the umbrella of extremism… especially when no criminal or violent action has taken place.
Thank you for your time and accountability in this matter. I look forward to your reply.
Sincerely,
[Your Full Name]
[City, Province]
[Phone or Postal Code – optional]
Substack Article Sources & References
Weaponized Femininity Report Coverage (Global News):
https://globalnews.ca/news/11309101/extremists-weaponizing-femininity-canadian-intelligence-reportRCMP Traditional Values Statement (NTD):
https://ntdca.com/rcmp-clarifies-stance-on-traditional-values-and-extremismRCMP Quote Coverage (NYPost):
https://nypost.com/2025/07/11/world-news/canadian-police-official-warns-traditional-values-may-be-sign-a-person-is-becoming-extremistGovernment of Canada – IIU (Behavioral Science):
https://www.canada.ca/en/innovation-hub